Join to Community

Do you want to contribute by writing guest posts on this blog?

Please contact us and send us a resume of previous articles that you have written.

Member-only story

How Empirical Psychology Vindicates Armchair Philosophy

Calvin Fisher

·5k Followers· Follow

Published in Thinking Off Your Feet: How Empirical Psychology Vindicates Armchair Philosophy

5 min read

401 View Claps

85 Respond

Save

Listen

Armchair philosophy has often been dismissed as mere speculation and unfounded conjecture. Sceptics argue that without empirical evidence, philosophical claims hold no real value. However, recent developments in empirical psychology have shed new light on the significant contribution armchair philosophy can make in our understanding of the human mind and behavior.

Empirical psychology, the scientific study of human behavior and mental processes, has traditionally approached its subject matter through experimentation, data collection, and statistical analysis. While this approach undoubtedly yields valuable insights, it has its limitations. The complexity of human experience and the intricacies of philosophical questions often challenge the methodologies employed in empirical psychology, limiting their effectiveness in addressing certain fundamental aspects of human nature.

This is where armchair philosophy steps in. Armchair philosophers use reason, logic, and intuitive insights to identify patterns and formulate theories about the nature of reality, knowledge, and the human mind. These theoretical frameworks, free from the constraints of empirical methods, allow armchair philosophers to explore questions that may be difficult to address through experimentation alone.

Thinking Off Your Feet: How Empirical Psychology Vindicates Armchair Philosophy

by Sheila Riley(Kindle Edition)

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1378 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	360 pages

The Power of Thought Experiments

One of the most potent tools in an armchair philosopher's arsenal is the thought experiment. By presenting hypothetical scenarios and analyzing their implications, we can gain deep insights into the workings of the human mind and moral decision-making processes.

For instance, consider the famous trolley problem thought experiment. It presents a situation where a runaway trolley is headed towards five people tied to a track, and you have the choice to divert the trolley onto a different track that would only kill one person. Should you actively intervene and sacrifice one life to save five? This dilemma raises fundamental questions about morality and the nature of our ethical principles.

Empirical psychology alone cannot provide definitive answers to such moral conundrums. However, armchair philosophers, through thoughtful analysis and logical reasoning, can offer compelling arguments and crucial insights into the underlying moral intuitions that inform our judgment.

Uncovering the Foundations of Knowledge

Armchair philosophy also plays a crucial role in examining the foundations of knowledge. Epistemology, the branch of philosophy concerned with how we acquire knowledge and what we can know, relies heavily on intellectual reflection and logical investigation.

Take, for example, the philosophical concept of "justified true belief." In epistemology, it is commonly held that knowledge is defined as a belief that is justified, true, and believed. This tripartite definition has long been subject to questioning and refinement by armchair philosophers. Through careful examination, they challenge and refine our understanding of knowledge, helping us to develop more nuanced perspectives on what it means to truly "know" something.

While empirical psychology can provide insights into how our cognitive processes work, it is up to armchair philosophy to connect these insights with broader questions about the nature of knowledge and understanding.

Integrating Empirical Findings with Philosophical Inquiry

The divide between empirical psychology and armchair philosophy is not an insurmountable one. In fact, the two can often inform and enrich each other. Empirical findings can serve as a valuable source of information for armchair philosophers, grounding their theories in observable phenomena and helping to steer their reasoning in productive directions.

Conversely, armchair philosophy can offer a conceptual framework with which to interpret and make sense of empirical findings. It provides a philosophical lens that allows psychologists to delve deeper into the meaning and significance of their results, going beyond the statistical significance to explore the underlying implications.

For example, consider the concept of free will. Empirical psychology can investigate the factors that influence decision-making processes, highlighting the determining factors behind our choices. Armchair philosophy, on the other hand, can explore the philosophical implications of these findings, asking whether our actions are truly free or whether they are predetermined by external factors.

The Value of Armchair Philosophy

While empirical psychology offers valuable knowledge about the human mind and behavior, it is armchair philosophy that enables us to make sense of that knowledge, connecting it to broader philosophical inquiries and exploring the deeper implications of our findings.

Armchair philosophy is not mere speculation; it represents a rigorous intellectual endeavor that requires logical reasoning, critical thinking, and careful analysis. By integrating its insights with the empirical findings of psychology, we can enhance our understanding of ourselves, the world around us, and how we navigate through it.

So, next time you encounter a philosophical question or engage in armchair ponderings, remember the valuable role armchair philosophy plays in vindicating our understanding of the human mind and vindicating the importance of rigorous intellectual inquiry.